DAILY ARTICLE - 3/31/06
Bucking a Stacked Deck
by
In the world according to the UN, the world's two worst serial human
rights abusers are theUnited States of America
and the State of Israel.
More UN resolutions have been passed condemning
There are 52 Islamic states. But of the 700-plus General Assembly
resolutions passed since the UN's 1945 establishment, nearly 450 condemnIsrael
.
There are 190 nations in the United Nations. And over sixty percent of
all General Assembly resolutions condemn just ONE member,Israel
!
Here are a few examples of the kinds of Israeli actions worthy of global
condemnation;
General Assembly Resolution 250 "calls on
General Assembly Resolution 251 "deeply deplores Israeli military
parade inJerusalem
in defiance of Resolution 250."
General Assembly Resolution 252 "declares invalid
General Assembly Resolution 271 "condemns'
General Assembly Resolution 476 "reiterates' that
General Assembly Resolution 673 "deploresIsrael
's refusal to cooperate with the United Nations"
In 2002, the State of Israel voted WITH the
Neighbor and trading partner
As to our Islamic and Arab 'allies', the UAE voted AGAINST theUS
88% of the time. The Saudis, 90%.Pakistan
, 87%.
In May, 2001, theUnited States
was kicked off the UN Human Rights Commission. Amnesty International concluded
in its 2002 report to the UN that theUnited States
"leads the world in human rights violations since September 2001."
It is important to remember that, while the UN Security Council pass ed
resolutions demanding Saddam's compliance with existing resolutions, the
General Assembly has NEVER issued a condemnation of an Arab state, including
Saddam's Iraq.
The United Nations opposed the
One can hear it repeated in virtually every liberal news report. What is
virtually buried, however, is the UN's multi-billion dollar stake in keeping
Saddam in power and the Oil-For-Food money flowing into the UN's unregulated
'trust' fund.
China, France, Germany and Russia led the opposition, demanding that the
UN be allowed to continue its 'peaceful, diplomatic efforts' -- something else
that makes nearly every liberal news report dealing with the events leading up
to the war.
What doesn't get mentioned is that
In the interests of global international relations,
Interestingly, they are the only two nations denying what is, to the rest
of the world, conventional wisdom.
Assessment:
Both the
In the case of theSudan
, it took the UN almost four years to acknowledge that an Islamic regime
wiping out it's non-Islamic population was a human rights violation.
So far, the UN has done nothing except talk about it as the massacres
continue unabated.
In the case of the
The report was issued by a UN group who refused to even visitGuantanamo
In its refusal, the UN gave some bizarre explanation that visiting Gitmo
would "contravene UN principles of human rights investigations."
The investigators particularly denounced the use of excessive violence,
citing photographs that show how detainees were shackled, chained, hooded and
forced to wear earphones and goggles.
Since none of them ever visiting Gitmo, the investigators don't know if
the photos were OF Gitmo, but that doesn't matter, since the UN declined to
identify the source of the pictures in the first place.
"They also showed beating, kicking, punching, but also stripping and
forced shaving' of detainees who resisted, the report said. 'It is of
particular concern that some of these violations have even been authorized by
the authorities," the report claimed without citing specific evidence.
The investigators also mentioned 'plentiful evidence' (again, never
specified,) that prisoners suffered serious mental health problems.
Remember, the UN never visited. The source of the 'plentiful evidence '
is evidently former detainees whose credibility the UN accepted without
question.
There is one Jewish state in the UN. Its only ally is a nation widely
criticized as the world's only Christian nation.
There are fifty-two Islamic states, with the remainder being avowedly
secular. Virtually ALL of them stand in lockstep opposition to both
The press calls it a 'coming war of civilizations' -- but only someone
with an incredible capacity for self-delusion could fail to recognize it as a
war between the God of the Bible and the god of Islam.
The prophet Daniel had received his vision of the 'Seventy Weeks' (see
"Daniel's Seventieth Week" https://www.omegaletter.com/articles.asp?ArticleID=98)
but it greatly troubled him.
"In the third year of Cyrus king ofPersia
a thing was revealed unto Daniel, whose name was called Belteshazzar; and the
thing was true, but the time appointed was long: and he understood the thing,
and had understanding of the vision. In those days I Daniel was mourning three
full weeks." (Daniel 10:1-2)
Daniel had seen a vision of the antichrist's peace deal withIsrael
, and his abrogation of it halfway through. He prayed and fasted for three
weeks as he waited for the angel to return to complete the vision.
When the revealing Angel returned, he explained he had been held up in
battle with the 'Prince of Persia' [
The Angel further reveals that Michael is "the great prince which
standeth for the children of thy (Daniel's) people." (the Jews) (Daniel
12:1)
But Daniel was concerned about the unveiling of the antichrist, an event
Daniel acknowledges "was true, but the time appointed was long."
Daniel's understanding of the vision was delayed by the Prince of Persia.
On the other end of the timeline, in this generation, we are like Daniel in
that respect.
Daniel was sick about the events of the tribulation as revealed to him.
He waited for an explanation of the event itself, just as we are waiting for
that event to take place in this generation.
But the revelation to Daniel was stalled by conflict with the Prince of
Persia.
On this end of the timeline, the current Prince of Persia (President
Ahmadinejad ofIran
) has outlined his intent to use nuclear war to start the conflict he believes
will bring about the return of the Mahdi, whom Islamic scholars identify as
the rider on the white horse of Revelation 6:3.
The rider on the white horse of Revelation 6:3 is the same coming prince
that threw Daniel into a three-week depression.
What about Daniel's Revealing Angel? Daniel describes Him thusly:
"His body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of
lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in
colour to polished brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a
multitude." (Daniel 10:6)
John describes the risen Christ in Revelation 1:13-15:
". . .One like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to
the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle. His head and His hairs
were white like wool, as white as snow; and His eyes were as a flame of fire;
And His feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and His
voice as the sound of many waters."
There is no other nation on earth that 'holds with' theUnited States
at the UN with the consistent reliability of the Israelis.
Now, take all this information and plug it into Daniel 10:21 and see what
YOU come up with.
"But I will shew thee that which is noted in the Scripture of Truth:
and there is none that holdeth with Me in these things, but Michael your
prince."
The deck is stacked, all right. But against the other side.
SOURCE: Omegaletter