Sanhedrin Project Unveiled With
Humility
November 3, 2005
A
conference this week unveiled the Sanhedrin project to the public, shifting away
from euphoric satisfaction with the launch of the Court one year ago and moving
toward broadening participation.
Since it was launched in Tiberias last year, the Court of 71 rabbis has strived
to fulfill the halakhic (Jewish legal) requirements for renewing
authentic semicha (rabbinic ordination passed down from Moses) and for
reestablishing the Great Court, which was disbanded 1,600 years ago. At
Sunday’s conference, distinguished members of the Court, led by Rabbi Adin
Even-Israel (Steinsaltz), presented a humble, yet exhilarating plan to widen the
scope and acceptance of the Court to truly move toward becoming the restored
Sanhedrin of old.
Along with the increasingly modest references to the current institution of a
Court or Sanhedrin project came new high-caliber participants in the project.
Rabbi Even-Israel publicly accepted the position of Nassi, President of
the Sanhedrin, and Rabbi Re’em HaCohen – head of the Otniel Hesder Yeshiva -
delivered the first address of the morning. Kiryat Arba Chief Rabbi and Dayan
(Rabbinical Court Judge) Dov Lior spoke both at the conference and later at the
festive meal.
Also participating in the conference were Rabbi Yisrael Rozen, who heads the Tzomet
Institute, and Rabbi Ratzon Arussi, Chief Rabbi of Kiryat Ono and a member
of the Chief Rabbinate. Both spoke about the relationship of Torah Law with the
law of the State of Israel, with Rozen focusing on the grassroots desire for
honest and sincere leadership in Israeli society following the crisis of the
Disengagement, and Arussi outlining the critical importance of the formation of
a unified court of Torah monetary law.
The crowd attending the conference, which took place in a synagogue in
Jerusalem’s Har Nof neighborhood, overflowed onto the street and consisted of
many stripes of religious Jews, with a sprinkling of secular Jerusalemites
interested in the return to biblical concepts.
“While it would be easy to write off secular Jewry as not interested in the
preservation of Jewish tradition and therefore not meriting consideration by the
Sanhedrin,” said Rabbi Re’em HaCohen in his opening address, “the
authority and divine inspiration of the ultimate Sanhedrin comes from the Divine
Presence, which our rabbis tell us rested upon the Jewish people at Sinai
because not one single Jew was left out or excluded. The Sanhedrin project is a
vehicle toward unity, and unity is what will be the vehicle that will restore
the Divine Glory to the Sanhedrin.”
Rabbi HaCohen also expressed the opinion that the project should refer to itself
as a Court more often than a Sanhedrin, in order to allow the recognized Gedolim,
Torah Greats, to join the effort.
The prevailing opinion of most of the senior members of the Sanhedrin is that
the Sanhedrin has not yet achieved full halakhic (Jewish legal) status on
par with its status before it was disbanded 1,600 years ago, but that its
restoration is truly underway.
In his speech accepting the position of Nassi, Rabbi Even-Israel said
that the task of building the Sanhedrin will take some time - but that the ark
that Noah built took 120 years to build. He expressed his opinion that the
project should steer clear of political pronouncements – a point that was
challenged by Rabbi Yisrael Ariel of the Temple Institute, who said that
publicly opposing the expulsion and supporting those Jews expelled from Gaza and
northern Samaria could not be referred to as political. The diverging viewpoints
gave those in attendance a glimpse of the manner in which Sanhedrin members
disagree with one another, recognizing their responsibility to enable the body
to provide a wide spectrum of religious Jewish thought.
Members of the Court delivered reports outlining how the nascent Sanhedrin is
already working toward fulfilling some of the primary functions that the
ultimate Sanhedrin must fulfill – the role of societal leadership. In ancient
times there was the Nassi, the legal head, and there was the Av Beit
HaDin, Father of the Court, who served more on a societal level. The
Sanhedrin was the ultimate authority of Jewish law one the one hand, and a body
of leadership for Jewish society on the other hand.
Among the projects currently being worked on are the Beit Din Bein HaAm
v’HaMedina, the Court Dealing With the Relationship Between the Nation and
the State. This Court, which is subordinate to the Sanhedrin, recently grabbed
headlines in the daily Maariv newspaper. The paper reported on an arrested
disengagement protestor, who was allowed by an Israeli secular court to obtain a
ruling from the Sanhedrin regarding whether or not to agree to restricted
conditions in exchange for release from prison.
Ettie Medad, wife of the director of the Honenu legal assistance organization,
accepted the Sanhedrin Court’s ruling to refrain from agreeing to the
restrictions, even though it meant indefinite continued incarceration with her
small child. She was released three days later after informing the secular court
of the ruling.
Currently in the courts is the case of a teenage girl who was arrested in the
former northern Samaria town of Sa-Nur and is refusing to be tried by secular
courts, asking to be tried by the Sanhedrin’s Court instead.
The Beit Din Bein HaAm v’HaMedina is also engaged in high level
discussions with the Ministry of Education in an attempt to improve the way in
which Bible is taught in Israel’s public school system.
Other topics addressed at the conference included the following:
* Rabbi Shabtai Sabato commended those behind the Sanhedrin project and Rabbi
Even-Israel (Steinzaltz), saying that the Sanhedrin has withstood its first
year, “in spite of all the derisiveness” toward the endeavor from some
sectors.
* Rabbi Nachman Kahane, currently the Av Beit HaDin, spoke about the
Sanhedrin project in light of world events and the failure of the United Nations
to reject the Iranian calls to eradicate Israel.
* Rabbi Yoel Schwartz, Vice-Av Beit HaDin, spoke about the Sanhedrin’s
achievements over the past year, including its interactions with the Ministry of
Education.
* Rabbi Yehuda Edri summarized the various opinions regarding the precise
location of the Holy Temple, a topic examined in depth by the Sanhedrin this
year.
* Rabbi Gideon Charlap, a master architect, summarized conclusions of the
Sanhedrin’s committee regarding the site of the Holy Temple - though the
Sanhedrin has not yet ruled on accepting the committee’s conclusions at this
time.
* Rabbi Michael Shlomo Bar-Ron spoke about the Sanhedrin’s mission
to the B’nei Noach, non-Jews who observe the seven laws of Noah. He
emphasized the high caliber and self-sacrifice of the Noahides he met on behalf
of the Sanhedrin who are coming to Israel in Tevet (January) to be ordained as a
high council for the B’nei Noach.
Sanhedrin spokesman Prof. Hillel Weiss, speaking with Israel
National TV (Click here to view - segment begins at 1:35 mark), said that
the Sanhedrin seeks to gain the support of the Jewish Nation not through
coercion or animosity, but through love, which will eventually culminate in a
basic law being put forth in the Knesset restoring the Court to its proper
authority.
One of those who took the day off from work to attend the conference was Efrat
resident Jeremy Gimpel. “I had read everything written about the renewed
Sanhedrin with such excitement, I had to see for myself,” Gimpel said. “What
struck me is that ever since Mt. Sinai, there were always 70 elders leading the
Jewish people and I believe that G-d, in His infinite wisdom, knew the Jews
would be dispersed among the 70 nations. To see all these rabbis and leaders
gathered back in the land of Israel, bringing with them different traditions,
cultures and approaches to Torah is a humbling experience and an answer to our
daily prayer of Hashiva shofteinu k'varishona, Return our judges as of
old.”
SOURCE: Arutz 7
